In a continuation
of the horrors of the Trump administration, net neutrality (aka laws that
protect equal access on the internet) could be rolled back this month based on
a vote from the FCC. There is a lot of talk surrounding the issue as media
outlets attempt to predict a future without net neutrality. Repealing the Open
Internet Order would allow corporations to monetize and control access to the
internet. This could mean anything from monthly subscriptions certain sites to
censorship, all that makes the internet a democratic forum would be taken away.
Beyond the
inconvenience, beyond the fear of blocked social media, repealing net
neutrality could be extremely harmful to low-income and minority groups in a
variety of ways, depending on the fate of internet accessibility. The free and
fair access of healthcare information online, thus far, has allowed for the
development of telemedicine, which allows individuals living in low-income and
rural areas, without the ability to regularly see a doctor, to have their
condition regulated through the internet. Everything from monitoring blood
pressure to health education can now be done over the internet, which cuts down
on the amount of outpatient appointment needed, substantially reducing medical
bills, and providing greater access to healthcare. Revoking net neutrality
threatens this accessibility, in a way that directly targets low-income
communities, making the complexities of our healthcare system that much more
difficult to navigate.
In addition,
open access to social media allows for grassroots organizing of minority
groups. This previously universal right to access the internet, allowed for free
and fast promotion of relevant issues impacting marginalized groups in order to
gain support and networks that can allow those voices to be heard. The internet
was a powerful force during the Egyptian Revolution in 2011, when thousands of
Egyptians protested the government for several days, resulting in the overthrow
of the President. Without net neutrality, opportunities to crowd source online
would be taken away. There could even be censorship, that would prevent access
to political information in opposition to the interests of the corporations or
broadband providers. The recent Women’s March on Washington was almost
completely organized through Facebook, successfully attracting thousands of
protesters to the capital in opposition of Trump’s inauguration. Powerful
social movements like these are being threatened by the impending doom of net
neutrality removal and it is pretty scary. The impact this government action
could have on minority groups is not getting enough attention in discussions
surround the repeal. Instead, internet users seem more concerned with prices
and internet speeds, rather than realizing the broader impact. While the
internet remains free and uncensored for the next week or so, it is important
to stay up to date on the status of the bill, as well as the decision of the
FCC. Until then, the fate of our democracy hangs in the balance.
I really like how you mentioned that net neutrality would impact access to health needs, because this is something I don't think many people would associate net neutrality with. Access to information is definitely a huge reason why disparities are able to be furthered in the US. The internet creates an even playing field, letting anyone access the same information. Furthering the systematic denial of educational and informational resources to those who can't afford their access would definitely help to further the divide between white access and that of minority groups.
ReplyDelete