When studying African American
history and looking at the historical genealogy which has lead us to 2017,
there are many specific dates which scholars study so that they can better
grapple with the subject. However, when looking at the birth of race in
America, there is no specific date. Scholars and historians have been arguing
about when slavery actually begun compared to a servitude for a set period of
time. With all these different historian’s
opinions on this date being given after slavery was abolished, it shows the
zeitgeist of the 1600’s, when very few people cared about when slavery truly
started.
In
the collection of essays, collected by Thomas C. Holt and Elsa Barkley Brown,
titled, Major Problems in
African-American History Volume I From Slavery to Freedom, 1619-1877, the
various authors all look retrospectively at the idea of when slavery actually
started in America. Modern historians try to grapple with the beginning of,
“the critical point being whether Negroes were enslaved almost from their
importation or whether they were at first simply servants and only later
reduced to the status of slaves (p. 92)”. To me, this shows how race was intertwined
in the beginning of the America, and how the whites did not care about the
Africans that came from over seas, and only saw them as their inferiors and
never questioned the idea. With all of the historians still arguing about this
today, proves that no one deemed it necessary in the 1600’s, to note down when
slavery begun. Americans at this time simply did not care about the
establishment about of slavery, proving America’s racist origins.
When
looking at African American history, the origins of how to all began is
generally over looked because it is so difficult to pinpoint its birth. This
proves that the white men “assumed that prejudice against the Negro was natural
and almost innate in the white man (p.93)”.
In my opinion, this debate proves the idea that the early Americans
viewed white skin as a default, and viewed everyone as less, is a common
theory, from which our nation was born. To prove that this was only based on
the color of skin, Winthrop D. Jordan highlights on three runaway servants. He
notes that one was a Scots man, a Dutchman, and the other, an African. Jordan
writes that the two white servants “were ordered to serve their master for one
additional year... but ‘the third being a nergo… shall his said master or his
assigns for the time of his natural life here or else where’ (p. 95)”. By
showing the results of this court case in 1640, proves that skin color was the
deciding factor in not only this court case, but would soon be the written laws
the would lead to the rise of America. No one seemed to care about this, or
look into the start of Slavery until much later, proving that slavery just
began with the idea of race as a function of appearance.
Brown, Elsa Barkley. Holt, Thomas C. Major Problems in African-American History, Volume I.
From
Slavery to Freedom, 1619-1877.
Your analysis on the origins, ideologically and chronologically, of slavery in America led me directly to the idea of "mutual causation," where European intellectual tradition and the exchange of people and products between West Africans and Europeans both contributed in unison to the formation of notions about racial inferiority of Africans that ideologically supported the institution. To borrow Professor McKinney's metaphor, it's not a question of the chicken or the egg, but rather the chicken and the egg.
ReplyDelete