Recently,
the FBI issued the report “Black Identity Extremists Likely Motivated to Target
Law Enforcement Officers” in an attempt to target groups of “violent blacks.”
In the report multiple “black extremist groups” are listed and are put on watch
by the FBI. However, the report fails to identify any white extremist groups
that may also have the potential to act on violence toward the police. This
systematic decision to target “black identity extremists” continues the trend
over the last century of fabricating a violent black identity. This FBI report
harkens back to times when people like Ell Persons were lynched because the
white community and law enforcement assumed blacks to be responsible for
violence. Similarly, just as law enforcement used to allow (and even partake
in) violence towards blacks simply “running crowd control,” this report ignores
and may potentially enable white extremist groups to continue acts of violence.
In
response to the report, Attorney General Jeff Sessions was asked about his own
knowledge and connection to the report. In one moment regarding “violent
blacks,” while Sessions claims, “there are groups that do have an extraordinary
commitment to their racial ideology,” Congress Woman Karen Bass quickly
responds “are you aware of white organizations that do this as well?” As
Sessions answers, it is comical, but also chilling, that he is unable to firmly
assert that organizations like the KKK and Neo-Nazis are white identity
extremists with violent capabilities. What is especially unsettling is that in
the wake of Neo-Nazi present violence in Charlottesville, blacks are still
being targeted white real and present extremist groups still exist in the US.
In the same interview, Sessions is asked whether he considers Black Lives
Matter to be a “violent extremist movement.” He similarly wavers at the
question (as the one previously mentioned) but ultimately chooses not to
express his beliefs on the movement.
This
brought one question to mind: If government officials are unable to investigate
the true nature of a social or political movement, how can they justifiably
target people involved with these protests? Although Black Lives Matter is not
specifically mentioned in the report, targeting groups where motivations are
simply understood seems to violate their right to freedom of speech. Under this
recent report, blacks are still targeted by extremist groups and law enforcement. If blacks are to
receive true equal protection, federal attempts must be made to shift focus
toward white extremist groups rather than away from these recorded and observed
sources of violence.
WC: 413
“Congress Woman Bass vs Jeff Sessions.” c-Span.org,
C-Span, 14 Nov. 2017,
www.c-span.org/video/?c4691627/congress-woman-bass-vs-jeff-sessions.
I think that there are many things to say about the way authority in this country looks down upon those who aren't white. I found it very interesting how black extremist groups onto the watch list, and left all of the white extremist groups off of it. After all of the recent protests on authority oppressing African Americans and the brutality of it all, I am surprised that all of this is happened. As our freedom of speech gets shorter, I think that it is more important to stand up to the laws, and be more extreme (without killing anyone of course). What do you think will lead to change? I personally think that the FBI will end up changing their list once it is too late, and some devastating event takes place. Equality is what this country needs, and when federal agencies do this, it sets us back into the times where civil rights movements were to dangerous that not even the president would send people to keep them orderly.
ReplyDelete