Friday, November 24, 2017

The Modern Assault on Voting Rights


            On August 6th, 1965, the Voting Rights Act was signed into law to correct “a clear and simple wrong,” as president Lyndon B. Johnson stated. “Millions of Americans are denied the right to vote because of their color. This law will ensure them the right to vote.” The legislation meant that the promise originally enshrined a century earlier in the 15th amendment would finally be realized.   Jim Crow methods of disenfranchisement, including literacy tests, poll taxes and others, were eliminated preventing states from instituting shrewd policies to subjugate voters of color. The law was seen as a monumental step forward towards racial equality and freedom. Within three years of its passage black voter registration increased significantly in the South to 62 percent, precipitating an important shift in American politics towards a more inclusive and representative government. Black legislators were increasingly put in office at both the local and national level, culminating in the election of the first black president, Barack Obama in 2008.
Unfortunately, the progress initiated in 1965 has constantly been under assault. Since the passage of the VRA a mostly conservative countermovement emerged seeking to legally dismantle the most powerful tenets of the law, and negate the work of generations of black politicians who have painstakingly toiled to increase ballot accessibility by easing registration laws and allowing for increased early voting periods. In 2013, voting rights took an especially painful blow when in Shelby County V. Holder, the Supreme Court annulled Section 5 authority of the VRA, which required federal approval to all changes in state voting laws. The decision gave states the authority to change their election laws as the please, fueling the countrywide rise in restrictive voter I.D.  regulations and significant roll-backs in early voting, while leading many to define the last four years as the worst period for voting rights since Jim Crow.
After the passage of the VRA, the anti-voting rights movement became a centerpiece of the thinly veiled and racially charged Southern Strategy started by Republicans to court conservative white Southern Democrats into the party. As part of their efforts, Republican operatives listed Section 5 as an “ultimate affront to states rights.” With the the battle raging on into the Reagan years, conservatives upped their rhetoric increasingly attacking Democrats for voter fraud in elections won by black candidates, and legally challenging the drawing of minority majority districts. Jump forward to the election of Obama in 2008, which triggered a GOP backlash in which only “27% of Republicans believed he won fair and square,” and prompted claims that a fraudulent black electorate was responsible for his success. 
In response to the election of Obama, between 2010 and 2013 eleven states passed restrictive voting laws paving the way for the Shelby County decision, the ramifications of which were especially evident during the 2016 Presidential election. In swing states that restricted their voting laws, like Wisconsin and North Carolina, minority voters were especially affected. In North Carolina black turnout reached a celling of 90% when compared to that of the 2012 election, with some counties falling as low as 60% of the 2012 black turnout.  In Wisconsin voter turnout in the minority-majority city of Milwaukee was considerably decreased to 41,000 fewer votes than in 2012, with poor black voters particularly affected by new I.D. laws.  
The battle against voting rights is another chapter in the history of white America’s unrelenting resistance to black equality.  While the VRA was a significant boon to black political enfranchisement, the efforts to reduce its power and restrict African Americans voting rights in recent years have dealt the bill substantial blows. It seems that politicians have yet to realize that history never really leaves us, and that Civil Rights legislation, no matter when it was passed, will always be pertinent to creating a nation where all citizens are granted the same legal rights.[1][2]

W.C. : 650





[1]   Jim Rutenberg, “A Dream Undone,” New York Times, July 29, 2015, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/29/magazine/voting-rights-act-dream-undone.html.
[2]  Vann R. Newkirk II, “What Early Voting in North Carolina Actually Reveals,” The Atlantic, November 8, 2016, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/north-carolina-early-voting/506963/.

No comments:

Post a Comment